Browse Items (22 total)

This is the full text of an interview with the author on the subject of data sharing, conducted in the wake of a data sharing editorial published by the The New England Journal of Medicine that warned against "research parasites".

After noticing a possible error in a scientific study, a researcher repeatedly requests access to the study's original supporting data without success.

The author argues for the release of the data from the controversial PACE trial, which concerns treatments of chronic fatigue syndrome and their effectiveness.

The author lists a variety of reasons why, in his experience, researchers do not share their data.

Discussion of authorship concerns when publishing open data, and how this affects early career scientists.

The author continues her call for case studies of research data re-use, as differentiated from re-use of data obtained from databases. She describes the responses received from the first call and resources that can be used to find more case studies.

The author suggests ways in which researchers and publishers can promote replication of sociology studies through data curation practices and requirements.

Feedback on the announcement of the OpenHouse Project, and a response from one of the founders. The discussion concerns openness and privacy issues regarding home sales data.

A report on the attempt to replicate 53 sociological studies, and the rate of response to requests for replication packages from social science researchers.

A description of contrasting ways that research data can be shared and obtained: free of charge via a willing researcher, or for a fee using donations from GoFundMe.